Unfair Review for SymphonicRO

[Valaris]

"Well made and lagless server with at least one GM on at pretty much any time.WoE hasn't started yet but there's no inn,GMs and players are the kind who want free castles for everybody and call more serious players no-lifers,so if you want competitive WoE don't bother."

I don't believe that this is a fair review considering the server is only 4 days old. On top of that, the complaints are about WoE, which was announced in advance that it won't even begin for a month after the server has opened. As for the removal of the Inns, that is the result of an advertised feature of the server, which is an alternative to most other server's Healers.

[wireless]

People are allowed to give guild competition a 10 before Woe has started, so why not 1? 

[Valaris]

The review itself is what I question. The other reviews are not based off of something they haven't experienced yet. That review is. It's like saying a movie has a horrible ending with only watching the first 10 minutes of it.

[Yusifer]

I agree; that person can't judge WoE as being non-competitive if WoE hasn't even started yet.

[Valaris]

The no Inn's comment also bothers me. It's like joining a server that is advertised 7/7/5, and then reviewing negatively because of low rates.

[yC]

Sorry Valaris.  It's a comment to the server, I don't see it being wrong consider those are not lies or anything.  If a 1/10 given to a server with no woe is wrong, tell me what to do with those that give a 8-10 without experiencing woe.  The Guild Competition score averaged to 8.6 before WoE even start, I think that's more than reasonable.

You already replied to the review, there's nothing more we can suggest.

[saga]

Unfortunately, the review does lie and is rather slanderous to the GM team. None of the GM's ever said that people who play the game seriously are "No lifers", nor inferred that anyone was doing anything wrong by being serious about the game. Many of us on the GM team are actually former "Serious/no life" players, and we encourage other "Serious" gamers and players and guilds to join the server. There are also other serious, competitive guilds on the server, and we are not seeking to give "everyone a castle", as that would be a sign of a really badly balanced WoE system. As WoE is not active at all, and we haven't even finalized the issues with WoE (as it's still well then a month away and we are STILL taking opinions from the populace on it), the review  cannot accurately judge the situation of WoE in and of itself. The review as it stands will slant people who read it, and reflects poorly on the team with no cause whatsoever. Everything past the first section of "Well made and lagless server with at least one GM on at pretty much any time.WoE hasn't started yet but there's no inn" is a flat out lie, exaggeration, and slanderous.

Like Valaris said, this review is not fair in any way, and should be removed. It's just as unbelievable as the others you've deleted from our posting such as other "100 point" reviews that we agree should have been removed. If you remove those 100 point reviews, this one should be removed as well, otherwise you shouldn't remove any, as to the people who posted the 100 point reviews were telling the "Truth" as they saw it and were just as valid a review as the one we're claiming is both slanderous, false, harmful, and wrong.

[yC]

I don't see how you can 100% sure this is false ->  "GMs and players are the kind who ... call more serious players no-lifers".  Unless you keep track of all conversation on the server.

If all you want to see is "Well made and lagless server with at least one GM on at pretty much any time.WoE hasn't started yet but there's no inn", I don't think a review system is right for you. 

As there is no WoE atm, how can you tell "so if you want competitive WoE don't bother." is false?  It is based on the user's current view of the server.  I am not saying it's true but it's not yet a provable statement so it's a comment coming from the heart.

the review cannot accurately judge the situation of WoE in and of itself

That would apply to all reviews on your listing because no one experienced WoE.  That means ...

[Valaris]

I'll live with that. I suppose my reply to the comment will be sufficient to those that go through reviews. This topic can be closed or deleted.

[yC]

Thanks for understanding Valaris.